課程名稱 |
組織社會學專題討論 SEMINAR ON SOCIOLOGY OF ORGANIZATION |
開課學期 |
94-2 |
授課對象 |
社會科學院 社會學研究所 |
授課教師 |
柯志哲 |
課號 |
Soc7026 |
課程識別碼 |
325 M2790 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
3 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期一6,7,8(13:20~16:20) |
上課地點 |
社112 |
備註 |
限碩士班以上 總人數上限:15人 |
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
屬於本課程討論範疇的傳統組織理論有韋伯與科層制度 (Weber and Bureaucracy), 科學管理學派(the Scientific Management School),人群關係學派(the Human Relations School),及結構權變學派(the Structural Contingency School)等。現代組織理論則包括資源依賴理論與網絡分析(Resource Dependence Theory and Network Analysis),組織經濟學(Economics of Organization),組織生態學(Organizational Ecology),及新制度理論(New Institutionalism)等。 |
課程目標 |
本課程目的在讓學生對傳統與現代組織理論做回顧與批判,探討組織理論發展的新方向,藉此來瞭解組織與社會間之關係。 |
課程要求 |
1.本課程的基本要求是課前閱讀當週指定教材,出席上課並參與討論。
2.修課同學必須分組做課堂口頭報告及撰寫書面報告。
3.必須撰寫期末研究報告 |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
每週一 13:00~14:00 |
指定閱讀 |
|
參考書目 |
1.課程講義讀本
2.Scott, Richard. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5th edition. Prentice-Hall. |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
期中考 |
0% |
|
2. |
期末考 |
0% |
|
3. |
作業 |
40% |
|
4. |
報告 |
50% |
|
5. |
出席 |
10% |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
2/20 |
導論及課程介紹 |
第2週 |
2/27 |
傳統組織理論(1)
Scott, Richard. 2003. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5th edition. Prentice-Hall.
Ch. 2. Organizations as Rational Systems
Ch. 3. Organizations as Natural Systems
Ch. 4. Organizations as Open Systems
|
第3週 |
3/06 |
傳統組織理論(2) |
第4週 |
3/13 |
傳統組織理論(3) |
第5週 |
3/20 |
Resource Dependence Theory (1)
1. Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations. Harper and Row. Read Chapter 1.
2. Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1988. “ A Resource Dependence Perspective on Intercorporate Relations.” Pp. 25-55 in Intercorporate Relations, M. Mizruchi and M. Schwartz. Ed. Cambridge.
﹡3. Casciaro, Tiziana and Milolaj Piskorski. 2005. “Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 50 (2): 167-199.
﹡4. Mizruchi, Mark S. 1989. “Similarity of Political Behavior among Large American Corporations.” American Journal of Sociology, 95: 401-24.
﹡5. 陳東升,2003,“高科技產業組織間關係的權力分析──以台灣積體電路產業的設計公司為例”,pp.57-104. 收於<積體網路:台灣高科技產業的社會學分析>,台北:群學。
|
第6週 |
3/27 |
Resource Dependence Theory (2) |
第7週 |
4/03 |
溫書日停課 |
第8週 |
4/10 |
Network Analysis (1)
1. 張苙雲、譚康榮,1999,「形構產業網絡」,頁17-64,《網絡台灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性》(張苙雲編)。台北:遠流。
2. Powell, Walter. 1990. “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.” Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, B. Staw and L. L. Cummings, ed. JAI.
Granovetter, Mark 1985. \\ |
第9週 |
4/17 |
Network Analysis (2) |
第10週 |
4/24 |
The Economics of Organization(1)
Transaction Cost and Agency Theory
1. Williamson, Oliver. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology, 87: 548-577.
2. Peterson, Trond. 1993. “The Economics of Organization: The Principal-Agent Relationship.” Acta Sociologica 36: 277-293.
3. Ouchi, William. 1980. “Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans.” Administrative Science Quarterly 25: 129-140.
﹡4. Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. and David B. Balkin. 1992. “Determinants of Faculty Pay: An Agency Theory Perspective,” Academy of Management Journal 35(5): 921-955.
﹡5. Walker, Gordon, and David Weber. 1984. “A Transaction Cost Approach to Make or Buy Decisions.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 373-391.
|
第11週 |
5/01 |
The Economics of Organization(2)
Transaction Cost and Agency Theory
|
第12週 |
5/08 |
New Institutionalism (1)
1. Meyer, John and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 : 340-63.
2. DiMaggio, Paul and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48:147-60.
3. 陳東升,1992,「制度學派理論對正式組織的解析」,《台灣大學社會科學論叢》40:111-133
﹡4. Tolbert, Pamela and Lynne Zucker. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 22-39.
﹡5. Dobbin, Frank and John R. Sutton. 1998. “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resource Management Divisions.” American Journal of Sociology, 104(2): 441-476.
|
第13週 |
5/15 |
New Institutionalism (2) |
第14週 |
5/22 |
Organizational Ecology (1)
1. Hannan, Michael and John Freeman, 1989. Organizational Ecology. Chapter 1.
2. 楊丁元、陳慧玲,業競天擇-高科技產業生態,民國87年,工商時報社。第一、二、四、九章
﹡3. Barnett, William P. 1990. “The Organizational Ecology of a Technical System.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 31-60.
﹡4. Singh, Jitendra V. and Charles Lumsden. 1990. “Theory and Research in Organizational Ecology.” Annual Review of Sociology 16: 161-95.
|
第15週 |
5/29 |
Organizational Ecology (2) |
第16週 |
6/05 |
New Directions for Organization Theory (1)
1. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 1997. New Directions for Organization Theory. Oxford University Press.
Ch. 1 The Development and Scope of Organization Studies
Ch. 9 New Directions for Organization Theory
2. Scott, W. Richard. 2004. “Reflections on a Half-Century of Organizational Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 1-21.
|
第17週 |
6/12 |
New Directions for Organization Theory (2) |
第18週 |
6/19 |
台灣組織實證研究之探討 |
第19週 |
6/26 |
期末考週 |
第20週 |
|
NULL |
|